|
| |
ISAR 2008 is now over. The program for ISAR 2009 will be posted in Spring 2009.
|
|
ISAR 2008 Program
|
| |
Day 1: Thursday 29 May 2008
|
Time
|
Program
|
|
8:00 –
9:00 pm
|
REGISTRATION:
Westin Pasadena Hotel
Pick up
ISAR 2008 materials
|
Day 2: Friday, 30 May 2008
|
Time
|
Program
|
|
7:00 –
8:00
|
REGISTRATION
|
|
8:00 –
8:30
|
OPENING.
Theodore J. Mock, ISAR Program Director and Professor, University of Southern California, USA & Maastricht University,
The Netherlands.
James G. Ellis, Dean, Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California
|
|
8:30 –
10:00
|
PLENARY
SESSION # 1: The Demand for (Academic) Audit & Assurance Research
Session Chair: Robert S. Roussey, Professor, University of Southern California, USA
and Former Chair of the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board
Speakers:
Thomas Ray, Chief Auditor and Director of Professional Standards, , Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board
Zhou Zhonghui, Chief Accountant, China Securities
Regulatory Commission, Peoples' Republic of China.
Steven Maijoor, Directeur Autoriteit Finamciele Markten, The Netherlands and Professor, University of Maastricht.
|
|
10:00 –
10:30
|
Morning
Break
|
|
10:30 –
12:00
|
PLENARY
SESSION # 2:
Session Moderator: Ken Trotman,
University of New South Wales
Post-Intervention Distortion of
Reviewer Judgment: Implications for the Audit Review Process, Mark E.
Peecher, U. of Illinois; M. David Piercey, U of Massachusetts; Jay S. Rich,
Illinois State University and Richard M. Tubbs, University of Iowa
Archival Evidence on Processes and
Outcomes of Internal Control Assessment under Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Jean C. Bedard, Bentley College and Lynford Graham, AICPA Audit Guide Audit Sampling Task
Force
|
|
12:00 –
1:30
|
Luncheon
|
|
1:30 –
3:00 pm
|
PARALLEL
RESEARCH SESSION 1.1
Session Moderator: Hun Tong Tan, Nanyang Technological University
Evaluating Internal Control Deficiencies:
Audit Partner Judgments about Compensating Controls, Audrey A.
Gramling , Kennesaw State University, Ed O’Donnell, University of Kansas and
Scott D. Vandervelde, University of South Carolina
Auditors’
Skeptical Characteristics and Their Relationship to Skeptical Judgments and
Decisions; Luc Quadackers, Free University
of Amsterdam and E & Y, Thomas Groot, Free
University of Amsterdam and Arnold Wright, Northeastern University
|
|
1:30 –
3:00 PM
|
PARALLEL RESEARCH SESSION 1.2
Session Moderator: Roger Meuwissen, University of
Maastricht
The Value of Auditing:
Evidence from the Timing of Earnings Announcements and Audit Report Dates,
Scott N. Bronson, Chris E. Hogan, Marilyn F. Johnson, and K. Ramesh; Michigan State University
The
Benefit Small and Medium Sized Enterprises Derive from External Audit,
Peter Carey, Monash University, Australia
|
|
3:00 –
3:30 pm
|
Afternoon
Break
|
|
3.30 –
5:.00 pm
|
PARALLEL
RESEARCH SESSION 2.1
Session Moderator: Terence Bu-Peow
Ng, Nanyang Technological University
Sole Versus Shared
Responsibility: Fraud Consultation and Auditor Judgment, Anna Gold-Nöteberg, Erasmus University, Netherlands, W. Robert
Knechel, University of Florida and Philip Wallage, Universiteit van Amsterdam and KPMG.
Judging Auditor Negligence: De-biasing
Interventions, Outcome Bias, and Reverse Outcome Bias, Jonathan H. Grenier, University of Illinois, Mark E. Peecher, University of Illinois and M. David Piercey,
University of Massachusetts Amherst
|
|
3.30 –
5:.00 pm
|
PARALLEL RESEARCH SESSION 2.2
Session Moderator: Dan O’Leary,
University of Southern California
Auditors with monopoly power: Is it a
level playing field for clients? Michael De Martinis Monash University, Keith Houghton The Australian National
University and Terry O’Keefe ,The University of Queensland and The University
of Oregon
The Association Between Institutional
Ownership and Audit Characteristics; Sam Han, Singapore Management University;
Tony Kang, Florida Atlantic University and Lynn Rees, Texas A&M
University
|
|
6:30 –
9:30 pm
|
Reception
and Dinner
Westin Pasadena Hotel
|
Day 3: Saturday, 31 May 2008
|
Time
|
Program
|
|
8:30 –
10:00
|
PARALLEL
RESEARCH SESSION 3.1
Session Moderator: Roger Simnett, University of New South Wales
The Influence of Documentation
Specificity and Fraud Risk Priming on Auditor Fraud Judgments and Evidence
Decisions, E. Michael Bamber, Tina D.
Carpenter, and Jacqueline S. Hammersley, University
of Georgia
Planning Fraud Detection
Procedures: Forensic Accountants vs. Auditors, J. Efrim
Boritz, Natalia Kotchetova
and Linda A Robinson, University of Waterloo, Canada
|
|
8:30 –
10:00
|
PARALLEL RESEARCH SESSION 3.2
Session Moderator: Mark DeFond, University of Southern California
Non-Audit Services and Auditor
Independence,
Kevin Koh, Nanyang Technological University,
Singapore, Shiva Rajgopal, University of Washington
and Suraj Srinivasan,
University of Chicago
Auditor-Provided Non-Audit
Services and Audit Effectiveness and Efficiency,
W. Robert Knechel, University of Florida and Divesh S Sharma, Florida
International University.
|
|
10:00 –
10:30
|
Morning
Break
|
|
10:30 –
12:00
|
PLENARY RESEARCH SESSION 3: Fraud
Risk Assessment
Theodore J. Mock, University of Southern California and Maastricht
University, The Netherlands.
Ronald L. Durkin, National Partner In Charge: Fraud and Misconduct
Investigations, KPMG
Jerry L. Turner, University of Memphis
Rajendra P. Srivastava, University of Kansas
|
|
12:00 –
1:00
|
Luncheon
|
|
1:00 –
2:30 pm
|
PARALLEL
RESEARCH SESSION 4.1
Session Moderator: Wendy Green, University of New South Wales
The Effect of Magnitude of Client
Reporting Difference and Order of Multiple Issues on Auditor-Client
Negotiations, Richard C. Hatfield, Richard W. Houston, Chad
M. Stefaniak and Spencer Usrey,
University of Alabama
When
does Advice Influence Auditors’ Decisions? Moderating
Effects of Performance Evaluation Focus and Client Attitude, Premila Gowri
Shankar and Terence Bu-Peow Ng, Nanyang
Technological University, Singapore.
|
|
1:00 –
2:30 pm
|
PARALLEL RESEARCH SESSION 4.2
Session Moderator: Peter Roebuck,
University of New South Wales
Was
Andersen Less than its Peers? A Comparative Analysis
of Audit Quality, Krishna R. Kumar and Lucy Lim, The George
Washington University
Auditor Independence in a Private Firm
Setting, Ole-Kristian Hope, University of
Toronto and John Christian Langli, Norwegian School
of Management
|
|
2:30 –
3:00 pm
|
Afternoon
Break
|
|
3:00 –
4:30 pm
|
PARALLEL
RESEARCH SESSION 5.1
Session Moderator: Rose M. Layton,
University of Southern California
Business
Modeling to Improve Auditor Risk Assessment: An Investigation of Alternative
Representations, Paulo S. C. Alencar,
University of Waterloo, J. Efrim Boritz, University of Waterloo and Carla Carnaghan, University of Lethbridge,
Canada
Identifying Auditor Stopping Rules in
Decision Making Under Uncertainty, Amanda W. White , University of
Technology, Sydney and Noel Harding, University of New South Wales, Australia
|
|
3:00 –
4:30 pm
|
PARALLEL RESEARCH SESSION 5.2
Session Moderator: Ann Vanstraelen, University of
Maastricht
Do
cross-listed firms provide the same quality disclosure as U.S. firms?
Evidence from the internal control deficiency disclosure under Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; Guojin Gong and Bin Ke, Pennsylvania State
University and Yong Yu, University of Texas at Austin.
The effect of internal control
regulation on earnings quality: Evidence from Germany; Nerissa C. Brown, University of
Southern California and Christiane Pott and Andreas
Wömpener, University of Münster
|
|
4:30 –
5:00 pm
|
CLOSING: CONCLUDING
COMMENTS AND INVITATION TO ISAR 2009
Theodore J. Mock, University of Southern California and Maastricht
University
Roger Meuwissen, Maastricht University
|
|
|